Han Hui Hui's allegations of prison treatment 'baseless and false': MHA
By Chong Zi Liang, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 15 Mar 2017
The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has asked blogger Han Hui Hui to remove a series of online posts in which she alleged judges had lied to persecute her politically.
The AGC wrote to her on Monday and gave her seven days to take down the posts and apologise for her allegations on all her social media accounts.
If she fails to comply, the AGC will file contempt of court proceedings against her, an AGC spokesman told The Straits Times yesterday.
By Chong Zi Liang, Political Correspondent, The Straits Times, 15 Mar 2017
The AGC wrote to her on Monday and gave her seven days to take down the posts and apologise for her allegations on all her social media accounts.
If she fails to comply, the AGC will file contempt of court proceedings against her, an AGC spokesman told The Straits Times yesterday.
Ms Han, 25, had posted a video on YouTube and made five Facebook postings between Jan 21 and Feb 25 about her brush with the law.
Last June, she was fined $3,100 for co-organising a protest rally in 2014 that disrupted a charity event in Hong Lim Park and organising a demonstration without approval.
Last month, the High Court rejected her appeal against the ruling.
Last June, she was fined $3,100 for co-organising a protest rally in 2014 that disrupted a charity event in Hong Lim Park and organising a demonstration without approval.
Last month, the High Court rejected her appeal against the ruling.
The AGC said on Monday the online posts are in contempt of court.
For instance, a Jan 22 post "wrongfully states that you and the other co-accused persons tried jointly with you were convicted because the court wanted to politically persecute you and your co-accused".
"In addition, it wrongfully insinuates the court secured your convictions by deliberately finding fault with you on unimportant issues."
Ms Han had written in the Jan 22 post that the court's ruling was "a blatant case of political persecution". She said her fine had "the sole intention of political persecution to disqualify me from standing for parliamentary election".
A person convicted of an offence and fined $2,000 or more is disqualified from being an election candidate. Ms Han stood in Radin Mas in the 2015 General Election.
A person convicted of an offence and fined $2,000 or more is disqualified from being an election candidate. Ms Han stood in Radin Mas in the 2015 General Election.
"These are very serious allegations which scandalise our courts. They are scurrilous, false and made without any rational basis," the AGC said in its letter to Ms Han.
Ms Han posted on her Facebook page on Monday that the AGC had written to her. But she has not taken down the posts the AGC says are in contempt of court.
In a separate statement yesterday, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) refuted Ms Han's claims that she had been mistreated in a State Courts cell. Prisons found the allegations "baseless and false" after interviewing officers and reviewing CCTV footage.
She alleged, among other things, that she was subject to a strip search while male officers walked by. MHA said she was clothed when she was searched by a woman officer. Also, she was held in the women's wing of the lock-up, which male officers cannot access.
She alleged, among other things, that she was subject to a strip search while male officers walked by. MHA said she was clothed when she was searched by a woman officer. Also, she was held in the women's wing of the lock-up, which male officers cannot access.
MHA noted Ms Han could have raised issues about her treatment while she was in custody.
"Instead, she chose to publish the fabricated, false and misleading accounts on social media.
"MHA takes all allegations seriously and will investigate them thoroughly. We will also vigorously defend our officers from baseless attacks to ensure that the integrity of our law enforcement agencies is not undermined," it said.
"MHA takes all allegations seriously and will investigate them thoroughly. We will also vigorously defend our officers from baseless attacks to ensure that the integrity of our law enforcement agencies is not undermined," it said.
* Blogger Han Hui Hui removes posts that were in contempt of court and issues apology
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 22 Mar 2017
Blogger Han Hui Hui has removed a series of online posts and a video in which she alleged judges had lied to persecute her politically, after the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) warned her that her claims were in contempt of court.
She has also apologised on her social media accounts and stated that she will not repeat the allegations, the AGC said in a statement yesterday.
Had she not done so, it would have commenced contempt of court proceedings against her.
The AGC said parts of her video and posts "scandalised the Singapore courts by stating that the Singapore courts had lied, that they were politically motivated in convicting and sentencing her, and that they sought to persecute and harass her".
"Her statements were scurrilous, false and made without any rational basis," it said.
Ms Han, 25, had posted a video on YouTube and made five Facebook postings between Jan 21 and Feb 25 about her brush with the law.
Last June, she was fined $3,100 for co-organising a protest rally in 2014 that disrupted a charity event in Hong Lim Park and organising a demonstration without approval. Last month, the High Court rejected her appeal against the ruling.
The AGC wrote to her on March 13, informing her that the video and posts were in contempt of court. For instance, a Jan 22 post "wrongfully states that you and the other co-accused persons tried jointly with you were convicted because the court wanted to politically persecute you and your co-accused".
The AGC added: "It wrongfully insinuates the court secured your convictions by deliberately finding fault with you on unimportant issues."
Ms Han had written in the Jan 22 post that the court's ruling was "a blatant case of political persecution". She also said her fine had "the sole intention of political persecution to disqualify me from standing for parliamentary election".
A person convicted of an offence and fined $2,000 or more is disqualified from being an election candidate. Ms Han stood in Radin Mas in the 2015 General Election.
The AGC gave her seven days to take down the posts and apologise for her allegations on all her social media accounts.
Yesterday, the AGC reiterated that contempt of court in its various forms harms the proper administration of justice in Singapore.
"Left unchecked, such conduct can obstruct the determination of the truth and erode respect for our judicial institutions. This would in turn harm the public interest in the proper administration of justice.
"AGC will take firm action against contempt of court, including the institution of committal proceedings in appropriate instances," it added.
By Chong Zi Liang, The Straits Times, 22 Mar 2017
Blogger Han Hui Hui has removed a series of online posts and a video in which she alleged judges had lied to persecute her politically, after the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) warned her that her claims were in contempt of court.
She has also apologised on her social media accounts and stated that she will not repeat the allegations, the AGC said in a statement yesterday.
Had she not done so, it would have commenced contempt of court proceedings against her.
The AGC said parts of her video and posts "scandalised the Singapore courts by stating that the Singapore courts had lied, that they were politically motivated in convicting and sentencing her, and that they sought to persecute and harass her".
"Her statements were scurrilous, false and made without any rational basis," it said.
Ms Han, 25, had posted a video on YouTube and made five Facebook postings between Jan 21 and Feb 25 about her brush with the law.
Last June, she was fined $3,100 for co-organising a protest rally in 2014 that disrupted a charity event in Hong Lim Park and organising a demonstration without approval. Last month, the High Court rejected her appeal against the ruling.
The AGC wrote to her on March 13, informing her that the video and posts were in contempt of court. For instance, a Jan 22 post "wrongfully states that you and the other co-accused persons tried jointly with you were convicted because the court wanted to politically persecute you and your co-accused".
The AGC added: "It wrongfully insinuates the court secured your convictions by deliberately finding fault with you on unimportant issues."
Ms Han had written in the Jan 22 post that the court's ruling was "a blatant case of political persecution". She also said her fine had "the sole intention of political persecution to disqualify me from standing for parliamentary election".
A person convicted of an offence and fined $2,000 or more is disqualified from being an election candidate. Ms Han stood in Radin Mas in the 2015 General Election.
The AGC gave her seven days to take down the posts and apologise for her allegations on all her social media accounts.
Yesterday, the AGC reiterated that contempt of court in its various forms harms the proper administration of justice in Singapore.
"Left unchecked, such conduct can obstruct the determination of the truth and erode respect for our judicial institutions. This would in turn harm the public interest in the proper administration of justice.
"AGC will take firm action against contempt of court, including the institution of committal proceedings in appropriate instances," it added.
Related
AGC Media Release: Removal of Contemptuous Material and Issuance of Apology by Han Hui Hui -21 Mar 2017
MHA: Han Hui Hui’s Allegations in Blog Post False -14 Mar 2017
CPF protesters heckle special needs children
AGC Media Release: Removal of Contemptuous Material and Issuance of Apology by Han Hui Hui -21 Mar 2017
MHA: Han Hui Hui’s Allegations in Blog Post False -14 Mar 2017
CPF protesters heckle special needs children
No comments:
Post a Comment