Can Singapore make room and rules for Airbnb and other home-sharing offerings?
As URA continues to study issue, residents and hospitality players remain divided
By Janice Heng and Yeo Sam Jo, The Sunday Times, 22 May 2016
From stylish apartments to cheerful single rooms, tourists in search of alternative lodgings in Singapore are spoilt for choice.
The website of Airbnb, a leading player in the home-sharing market here, has options such as a Kallang shophouse for $249 a night, a Tiong Bahru flat for $114 or a room in East Coast with queen-sized bed and balcony for a mere $48.
According to Airbnb, there are about 6,000 properties listed on its website here.
Other home-sharing websites have set up here as well, such as PandaBed and Roomorama.
Yet, it is currently illegal for private and public home-owners to lease their properties for less than six months.
While a few home-sharing site listings are for long-term options, most are for short stays, which means they are breaking the law.
The authorities are still trying to decide if rules should be relaxed for private properties.
As URA continues to study issue, residents and hospitality players remain divided
By Janice Heng and Yeo Sam Jo, The Sunday Times, 22 May 2016
From stylish apartments to cheerful single rooms, tourists in search of alternative lodgings in Singapore are spoilt for choice.
The website of Airbnb, a leading player in the home-sharing market here, has options such as a Kallang shophouse for $249 a night, a Tiong Bahru flat for $114 or a room in East Coast with queen-sized bed and balcony for a mere $48.
According to Airbnb, there are about 6,000 properties listed on its website here.
Other home-sharing websites have set up here as well, such as PandaBed and Roomorama.
Yet, it is currently illegal for private and public home-owners to lease their properties for less than six months.
While a few home-sharing site listings are for long-term options, most are for short stays, which means they are breaking the law.
The authorities are still trying to decide if rules should be relaxed for private properties.
From January to April last year, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) held a public consultation to assess if this short-term rental policy for private properties needed to be reviewed.
But last Wednesday, more than a year on, the URA said it needs more time to consider the issue.
In the meantime, enforcement action will still be taken, it added.
Under current rules, private home-owners who lease their units for less than six months can be fined up to $200,000 and jailed for up to a year.






