GE2025 electoral boundaries announced: 15 SMCs and 18 GRCs

Extensive changes to electoral boundaries due to population shifts; number of MPs raised from 93 to 97

By Linette Lai, The Straits Times, 12 Mar 2025

Major changes ahead of Singapore’s next general election will see the creation of one more group representation constituency and an additional single-seat ward, bringing the total to 18 GRCs and 15 single-member constituencies.

The number of elected MPs will increase to 97, up from 93 now.

The revisions will see electoral boundaries change in 22 out of the current 31 constituencies.

The release of the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) report on March 11 marks a major step on the road to the next general election, which is expected to be held in the first half of 2025.

Explaining its recommendations, the EBRC said in its report that voter numbers have grown significantly in Pasir Ris-Punggol, Sembawang and Tampines GRCs, as well as the single seats of Hong Kah North and Potong Pasir.

This is largely due to population shifts and new housing developments in these areas, it said. Voter numbers in each of these constituencies have increased by more than 10,000 since GE2020.

Revisions to electoral boundaries in these areas had knock-on effects on boundaries in some surrounding constituencies, the EBRC said.

With the latest changes, the number of four-member GRCs will grow from six to eight, while the number of five-member GRCs will go down from 11 to 10.

One key change is the creation of a new four-member Punggol GRC. It will take in Punggol West SMC and parts of Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, which will shrink into a new four-member Pasir Ris-Changi GRC.

Five SMCs have been taken off the map, while six new ones have been added. The single seats removed are: Bukit Batok, Hong Kah North, MacPherson, Punggol West and Yuhua.

The new SMCs have mostly been carved out of existing GRCs. They are: Bukit Gombak, Jalan Kayu, Jurong Central, Queenstown, Sembawang West and Tampines Changkat.

Three polling districts in Tampines West, east of Bedok Reservoir, have been moved from the opposition-held Aljunied GRC to Tampines GRC.

Sengkang GRC, which is also held by the Workers’ Party, is among nine constituencies to see no changes to electoral boundaries. The other eight are Bishan-Toa Payoh, Jalan Besar, Marsiling-Yew Tee and Nee Soon GRCs; as well as Bukit Panjang, Hougang, Marymount and Pioneer SMCs.

An estimated 2,753,226 voters will head to the polls in 2025, an increase of 101,791 from GE2020.

The EBRC submitted its report to Prime Minister Lawrence Wong on March 7. Its recommendations have been accepted by the Government, the Elections Department (ELD) said on March 11.

Significant changes have been made in the east and west of Singapore, where the fiercest electoral battles are expected to be fought.

In the east, the new Pasir Ris-Changi GRC will be formed by merging parts of Pasir Ris-Punggol and East Coast GRCs.

East Coast remains a five-member GRC. However, it will take in 15 polling districts from Marine Parade GRC – mostly flats in Chai Chee and private estates in Siglap. The constituency was hotly contested by the People’s Action Party and WP in 2020, with the ruling party eventually winning 53.39 per cent of the vote.

A new five-member Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC will absorb the single seat of MacPherson. It will take in two polling districts from Potong Pasir, where many new flats have been built in the Bidadari area, and parts of the existing Marine Parade GRC and Mountbatten SMC.

In the west, the new five-member West Coast-Jurong West GRC will take in estates from neighbouring Jurong West and Taman Jurong, which are in Jurong GRC.

Estates in Dover and Telok Blangah, which are part of the existing West Coast GRC, will be absorbed into Tanjong Pagar GRC. West Coast GRC saw the closest fight in 2020, when the PAP won with 51.69 per cent of the vote against the Progress Singapore Party.

Meanwhile, a new five-member Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC will take in polling districts from the existing Jurong GRC, as well as parts of three SMCs which have been taken off the map – Bukit Batok, Hong Kah North and Yuhua.

The EBRC, made up of five senior civil servants, was formed seven weeks ago on Jan 22. It was directed to keep the average size of GRCs, the proportion of MPs elected from SMCs, and the average ratio of electors to elected MPs, about the same.

The average number of MPs in each GRC will be 4.56, down from 4.65. In the coming general election, there will be approximately 28,384 voters per MP, compared with 28,510 now.

And about 15.5 per cent of MPs will be elected from single-seat wards, compared with 15.1 per cent at the last election.

The next big step will be when Parliament is dissolved and the Writ of Election issued. The writ sets out a date for Nomination Day, when candidates confirm the constituencies in which they will stand.

Nomination Day will likely be followed by the minimum nine-day campaign period and Cooling-off Day – when campaigning is banned – before Polling Day.

In the past four general elections, the time between the release of the EBRC report and Polling Day has ranged from two to four months.

In a Facebook post, PM Wong acknowledged that the report had been submitted.

“The next milestone will be to update and certify the Registers of Electors, before the elections are called later,” he said.

Political observers noted that it is the first time in several decades that the EBRC has laid out reasons for its decisions. Past reports since the 1990s have typically set out boundary changes with little explanation.

The committee may have done so in response to calls for greater transparency on how it works, they suggested.

In a statement, the PAP said its branches and activists will make the “necessary adjustments” to prepare for the general election.

“Meanwhile, residents can continue to seek assistance from their existing PAP branches,” it added.

Party branches will continue to listen to residents’ feedback, understand their needs, and act on their behalf to improve their communities, it said.

GST hike did not ‘turbocharge’ inflation, says PM Lawrence Wong as he acknowledges cost-of-living concerns

Budget 2025 Debate Round Up Speech

This Government will always uphold fiscal responsibility, says PM Lawrence Wong

By Wong Pei Ting, The Straits Times, 1 Mar 2025

The PAP Government will never take risks with Singaporeans’ lives and their future – this means ensuring that it keeps public finances healthy year after year and spending within its means, said Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.

PM Wong also cautioned against attempts to portray a healthy surplus as somehow detrimental to Singaporeans as he addressed criticism from opposition MPs about poor budget marksmanship.

“Let’s try not to put a wedge between the Government and the people... A strong fiscal position for Singapore is not at the expense of Singaporeans,” he said. “In fact, it benefits Singaporeans in so many ways, because we are able to invest more in Singaporeans.”

In an hour-long speech wrapping up the Budget debate on Feb 28, he also responded to the opposition’s suggestion that the Government had raised the goods and services tax earlier than it needed to, given an expected surplus of $6.4 billion for financial year 2024, compared with the $778 million that had earlier been projected.

Singapore is in a strong fiscal position today precisely because it took the necessary steps early in this term of government to raise revenues ahead of expected structural spending needs as the population ages, said PM Wong.

While the Republic was fighting the Covid-19 pandemic, it could already foresee spending needs going up on the horizon.

“This was 2020, 2021 – we had no way of knowing when the pandemic would end, how the virus would mutate, how many more new waves of infection would we face, how many more restrictions we have to impose, and how much deeper a fiscal hole we would end up with,” PM Wong said.

The authorities made the decision to proceed with the GST increase in Budget 2022, accompanied by enhancements to a package to delay the increase for most Singaporean households, when there were signs that the economy had stabilised.

“We must ask ourselves, do we want short-term populism or long-term stability?” PM Wong asked. “Do we want to kick the can down the road or take the hard but necessary decisions?”

With the GST increase in place, the Government has the additional revenues – mostly from those who are better off, foreigners and tourists – that it needs to improve healthcare infrastructure and take better care of seniors, he said.

Were it not for the GST hike, and unexpected upsides in corporate income tax collections, FY2024 would have ended in deficit, as would projections for FY2025, he added.

“That would have meant less funding for essential services, less support for our seniors and fewer resources to invest in our future,” he said.

“Basically, Singapore and Singaporeans would have ended up in a much weaker position.”

PM Wong refuted Leader of the Opposition and Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh’s proposition that the GST hike had “turbocharged” inflation.

As Singapore is a small and open economy, inflation was driven primarily by global factors, such as war and supply chain disruptions, said the Prime Minister.

In the two years when GST was raised, price increases actually moderated, from 6.1 per cent in 2022 to 4.8 per cent in 2023 and 2.4 per cent in 2024, he pointed out.

He noted that in most countries, poor budget marksmanship refers to when governments severely overestimate revenue collections and underestimate expenditures.

This results in unfunded promises that a country cannot keep, because there is not enough money. Alternatively, it borrows to meet these commitments, thereby leaving a growing burden for the next generation.

This is not the case in Singapore, as the Republic practises responsible and prudent budgeting, PM Wong said.

Earlier in the debate, Mr Singh had called the Government’s fiscal projections “so unpredictable, but somehow always so healthy when elections have to be called”.

This point was echoed by Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Non-Constituency MP Leong Mun Wai, who said that “so much pain” had been inflicted on Singaporeans by the decision to raise GST in 2023 and 2024.

PM Wong said that, ultimately, it was not a matter of marksmanship, but a question of right or wrong fiscal principles.

“The WP and the PSP may think that we are being overly cautious in our projections, but this Government will never take risks with Singaporeans’ lives and future,” he said.

This includes raising revenues should new spending needs arise, he added.

On the charge by opposition MPs that the Government had been relying on temporary measures such as vouchers to deal with cost pressures instead of making structural reforms, PM Wong said that cost-of-living support and the SG60 package accounted for just 5 per cent of the Budget.

A far larger part of government spending is in structural programmes such as SkillsFuture to empower Singaporeans through skills and job training, he said.

“This will ensure Singaporeans do not just receive help, but are able to stand on their own feet and seize better opportunities for themselves and thrive in a rapidly changing world,” he said.

Objectively speaking, this has helped Singaporean households across different income levels achieve higher real income growth in the past decade than countries like the United States and Japan, he added.

For instance, the bottom 20 per cent of households here saw their wages rise 3.6 per cent per annum between 2013 and 2023, compared with 2.1 per cent in the US and minus 1.6 per cent in Japan.

Singapore’s fiscal approach has also stood it in good stead – while many countries use their tax revenues to service interest payments, the Republic instead receives an annual boost from its investment returns.

“Countries that have this luxury of investment returns are the ones that are endowed with oil and gas or some other natural resources – they have been blessed by the heavens with these endowments,” PM Wong said.

‘We have nothing, and yet we are in this position. It is truly unique, and it is a Singapore miracle.”

Singapore’s fiscal strength is a vital source of competitive advantage in these turbulent times, which look likely to get worse, said PM Wong.

He flagged the ongoing wars in Europe and the Middle East, and the possibility of conflict in Asia.

Today’s environment means global responses to these threats will sadly not be as well coordinated or effective as before, he added.

“But in Singapore, we know that if such shocks were to arise, we have the ability to respond swiftly to them, like we did during Covid-19,” he said.

“Our reserves and our fiscal strength will enable us to protect Singaporeans when it matters, and to turn adversity into opportunity.”

In a Facebook post in the evening, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Singapore must continue to spend prudently, so that it can tackle and recover from future challenges swiftly, as it did with Covid-19.

Reflecting on SG60 – the country’s 60th year of independence – SM Lee said the country’s strong fiscal footing has been built through the careful stewardship of the earlier generations. He said: “It gives us confidence to move forward sustainably, so that future generations can enjoy the fruits of Singapore’s progress.”

PM Wong said the Government’s approach has also achieved outcomes that reflect Singapore’s values as a society – one that is fair, prudent and progressive, where the better off contribute more to lift up those with less.

For instance, the bottom quintile of households receives $4 in benefits for every dollar of tax paid, while the top quintile of income earners receives 30 cents.

“There is no fiscal system in the world that can deliver perfect precision and equity. But I think we have found an approach in Singapore that works for us,” he said. “It’s not perfect, but we continue to make it better.”

At the end of the day, PM Wong said, Singaporeans will decide whether they prefer a government that underestimates needs and spends more from the reserves, leaving the country weaker, or one that steadfastly upholds fiscal responsibility and discipline so that current and future generations have the resources to handle unexpected challenges.

“We will continue to do our best to convince Singaporeans that ours is the right approach. It has served us well these last 60 years, and it will continue to keep Singapore on the right track in the years ahead,” he said.